Plaintiff Marcia G. Samms sought to recover damages from David Eccles for injury resulting from severe emotional distress she claims to have suffered because he persistently annoyed her with indecent …

PlaintiffMarcia G. Samms sought to recover damages from David Eccles for injury resulting from severe emotional distress she claims to have suffered because he persistently annoyed her with indecent …

Samms says she has never encouraged Eccles' attention in any way, but for 7 months, Eccles repeatedly called Samms soliciting her to have sexual relations and on one occasion, he came to her …

Get Samms v. Eccles, 358 P.2d 344 (1961), Utah Supreme Court, case facts, key issues, and holdings and reasonings online today. Written and curated by real attorneys at Quimbee.

Dec 4, 2021 · Samms v Eccles. Defendant sexually harassed plaintiff. Plaintiff suing for the emotional distress caused by the actions of the Defendant.

Jan 1, 2014 · Law School Case Briefs, Legal Research, and Book Outlines Wednesday, January 1, 2014 Samms v. Eccles case brief Samms v. Eccles case brief summary 358 P.2d 344 (1961)

Radovskis v Tomm: P must prove recognizable psychiatric illness or physical harm. Samms v Eccles: Can recover for intentional, outrageous emotional distress.

In the bill collection cases, as in the Samms case, recovery was allowed for a series of actions calculated to inflict severe emotional distress; however, there is some authority for allowing recovery …

Plaintiff Marcia G. Samms sought to recover damages from David Eccles for injury resulting from severe emotional distress she claims to have suffered because he persistently annoyed her with indecent …

Samms v. Eccles - Legal case analysis, key holdings, and legal precedent on StrongSuit.